Everything
All 1851 pieces since 2005 in one stream — articles, books, talks, videos, newsletter editions, and podcast episodes, newest first.
What AI automates becomes measurable. What stays human, the judgment, the taste, the relationship, is hard to count. So the human work turns invisible in your metrics right as it becomes the thing that sets you apart, and what you can't measure, you tend to…
Exponential change rewards keeping your options open, so leaders hedge, pilot, and wait. But a moat is built by committing, and endless optionality means you never build one. At some point flexibility stops being smart and starts being an excuse not to…
The plan is sensible: let AI take the drudgery so your best people do higher-value work. But sometimes the drudgery was the craft they loved, the part that made the job theirs. Strip it out and you can quietly remove the reason they stayed. Automating the…
AI optimizes toward what already works, then shows you more of it. That feels efficient, but it quietly narrows the field: you stop meeting the odd option, the outlier, the thing that could have beaten the best you know. Optimization and discovery pull in…
When expertise has a short half-life, hiring for what someone knows today is buying a depreciating asset. The durable trait isn't current knowledge, it's how fast someone relearns when the ground shifts. The best hire may not be the one who knows the most…
Adopting AI for convenience is easy, and convenience quietly becomes reliance. Then the tool changes, prices jump, or it goes down, and you find your team can no longer do the thing without it. Resilience erodes so gradually that no one notices until it's…
When AI compresses every cycle, the pull is to optimize for what pays off now. But the things that compound slowly, trust, brand, deep skill, relationships, were exactly the ones a competitor couldn't rush. Trade the slow bets for speed and you swap a durable…
AI handles the common case beautifully. But the rare case, the exception, is where the real risk and value sit, and handling it well takes practice on the common case. Automate the routine entirely and your team slowly loses the feel for the moment the…
As AI decisions get more complex, "why did it do that" gets harder to answer. But accountability doesn't move: you still own the outcome. That's the gap, being responsible for a call you can't fully explain, to a customer, a regulator, or your own team. Which…
A lot of trust runs on effort being scarce. The cover letter, the detailed proposal, the thoughtful review all signalled that someone cared enough to try. When AI makes that effort free, the signal stops meaning anything, and systems built on proof-of-effort…
For decades we designed software to last because building it was expensive. AI is changing the cost of creation but not the cost of verification. If generating software becomes cheaper than trusting it, the reusable asset may no longer be the code — it may be the confidence we can carry forward.
Presented at Green IO London 2026 on Green Agentic AI — embedding sustainability into the design and operation of AI agents, measuring their impact across carbon, energy and water, and building more resource-efficient intelligent systems.
AI gets you to ninety percent in minutes, and that speed is intoxicating. But the last ten percent, the judgment, the edge cases, the taste, is where the value and nearly all the effort live. Teams underestimate it because the first ninety looked so easy. The…
People can now produce polished work in areas they don't understand. So output stops being proof that someone knows the work. The person who shipped it and the person who could catch its mistakes are no longer always the same person. Skill and output have…
The YouTube Silver Creator Award arrived this week. What started as a passion for exploring technology, AI, sustainability, and emerging innovations has gradually grown into a wonderful community — thank you to everyone who has subscribed, watched, shared, or engaged.
AI learns from the average of everything it saw, so it pulls your work toward the middle: competent, safe, unremarkable. But advantage lives at the edges, in the choices most people wouldn't make. Lean on it for everything and your output drifts to the mean,…
AI removed the cost of producing options. So the work moved: from making the options to choosing between them, and that was always the harder part. More paths to weigh can mean slower, worse decisions, not better ones. Generating ideas isn't the bottleneck…
Any capability you get straight from a public model, your competitor gets too, at the same time, for the same price. The edge was never the model. It's the data, the process, and the relationships the model can't copy. If AI handed you the advantage, it can…
Each automation looks obviously worth it on its own. Add enough of them and you get a system that works but that no single person can explain. Every local call was rational; the whole is opaque. The risk isn't any one decision. It's the sum nobody chose on…
A tool's capability changes in months. Your approvals, processes, and habits update in years. So you're almost always running last year's playbook on this year's capability, and the gap isn't a skills problem. It's a speed-of-absorption problem. The edge goes…
Building your core capability on a model you don't own means your edge now moves on someone else's roadmap: their pricing, their changes, their priorities. Renting capability is fine until it becomes the thing you compete on. Then the question is whose…
The first question isn't only whether it works. It's whether you can undo it. Some moves are reversible. Others quietly become one-way doors: a dependency you can't unwind, a skill your team no longer has, a process you already deleted. Speed is cheap on…
The failure mode with AI isn't trusting it too much or too little. It's trusting it evenly when its reliability is uneven, sharp on some tasks, shaky on others. Flat trust on a bumpy surface is how a system that's right most of the time still hands you the…
elegating to a system you can't see into means you also hand over the error signal: the small friction that used to tell you something was going wrong. You didn't just delegate the task. You delegated the ability to notice it's off course. Where have you lost…
When a tool answers almost any question you pose, the value moves to posing the right one. That's the part AI doesn't do for you, and using it more doesn't build the skill. The people who pull ahead won't have the best answers. They'll be the ones asking the…