What if AI is making you more capable—but not smarter?
We’ve spent the last few years learning how to get AI to produce more.
More code.
More content.
More analysis.
More decisions.
But there’s a question we’re not asking enough:
Who owns the thinking?
In the latest edition of Technology Bytes, I explore Cognitive Ownership: The AI Literacy We’re Not Teaching.
I introduce three ways we can work with AI:
🔹 AI as a Tool — Human thinks → AI accelerates
🔹 AI as a Collaborator — Human thinks ↔ AI challenges
🔹 AI as a Substitute — AI thinks → Human approves
The third may be the most productive-looking—and the one we need to examine most carefully.
Because when AI can produce an answer faster than we can think through the problem, a new gap can emerge:
The Thinking Gap — the distance between what AI can produce and what we can independently understand, defend, and modify.
And as we move toward agentic AI, that gap could matter even more.
The question isn’t whether AI makes us smarter.
The question is: What do we still own when AI does the thinking?
Read the latest Technology Bytes and tell me:
Are you using AI to think better—or to think less?